STRATEGIC GUIDELINES

Eight principles
from evidence to access

A practical framework drawn from my published work and 14 years across Pharma and MedTech. Each principle ends with a test your team can apply tomorrow.

Jasmin Tiedemann writing in a notebook

WHAT THE DATA SHOWS

Why value is not recognised by default

01

Start with the unmet need

Define who is underserved, what changes in their daily life, and which decision-maker can act on it — before choosing a single endpoint.

The testCan you name the patient group, the gap and the decision in one sentence?

02

Design evidence for the decision

Map every evidence piece to a payer, HTA or clinical question. Evidence that answers no decision is cost, not value.

The testDoes each study link to a named criterion in the assessment?

03

Challenge the category

Classification can decide value before evidence is read. Test whether the comparator and group reflect function, intended use and patient outcome.

The testIs the comparison fair — or merely convenient?

04

Make wider value credible

Societal, carer and patient value matter only when measured transparently. Use SROI and PROs with clear assumptions, not as advocacy.

The testWould a sceptical assessor accept the method?

05

Separate EU from national

JCA strengthens shared clinical evidence. Price, budget and reimbursement stay national — plan for both tracks from day one.

The testIs there a country-level access plan beyond the JCA dossier?

06

Use AI, keep judgement

AI can generalise, screen and accelerate. Context, trade-offs and knowing which question is worth answering remain human work.

The testWho owns the final interpretation?

07

Anticipate roadblocks

Rigid budgets, legacy classifications and missing comparators are predictable. Name them early and assign an owner and a mitigation.

The testIs every known roadblock on the risk log?

08

Measure access, not approval

A positive recommendation is a milestone, not the finish line. Track uptake, prescriber reach and patients actually served.

The testHow many patients have real access today?

Figures are reported with their original denominators and limitations. Positions are the author's own, not study results.

LET’S ASK BETTER QUESTIONS

What is standing between
your evidence and access?

Discuss your access challenge